Helical gears, while offering numerous advantages over spur gears, such as smoother operation and higher load-carrying capacity, also present a significant drawback: increased axial thrust. This is a key disadvantage that engineers must carefully consider during the design process.
Understanding Axial Thrust in Helical Gears
Unlike spur gears, whose teeth are parallel to the axis of rotation, helical gears have teeth that are inclined at an angle to the axis. This helical arrangement, while beneficial for reducing noise and vibration, creates a component of force along the axis of the gear shaft. This force is known as axial thrust.
How Axial Thrust Impacts Gear Design
This axial thrust necessitates several design considerations:
-
Bearing Selection: The bearings supporting helical gears must be capable of withstanding significant axial loads in addition to radial loads. This often means using more robust and potentially more expensive bearings than those required for spur gears. Improper bearing selection can lead to premature bearing failure.
-
Thrust Washers: To manage the axial thrust, thrust washers or other thrust-bearing mechanisms are often incorporated into the gear design. These components add complexity and cost to the overall system.
-
Shaft Design: The shafts supporting helical gears need to be designed to withstand the bending moments and axial forces generated by the gear meshing and axial thrust. This can lead to larger shaft diameters and increased material costs.
-
Housing Design: The gear housing must be robust enough to accommodate the axial forces and prevent misalignment of the gears. Improper housing design can lead to gear damage and system failure.
-
Efficiency: While helical gears are generally efficient, some energy is lost in overcoming the friction associated with axial thrust. This loss, though often small, can become significant in high-power applications.
Mitigation Strategies
While axial thrust is an inherent characteristic of helical gears, its effects can be mitigated through various design choices:
-
Herringbone Gears: These gears employ a double helical design with teeth angled in opposite directions, effectively canceling out the axial thrust. However, these gears are more complex and expensive to manufacture.
-
Careful Gear Design: Optimizing the helix angle can reduce axial thrust, although this might compromise other performance characteristics like noise reduction. A balance must be struck between minimizing thrust and maximizing other benefits.
-
Improved Lubrication: Proper lubrication can help to reduce friction and minimize energy losses due to axial thrust.
Conclusion
The increased axial thrust generated by helical gears is a significant disadvantage that engineers must carefully consider during design. While the benefits of smoother operation and higher load capacity often outweigh this drawback, it's crucial to account for the implications on bearing selection, shaft design, housing design, and overall system efficiency. Careful planning and potentially the use of mitigating strategies are essential for successful implementation of helical gears.
